Monday, July 1, 2013

Blood Test Might Spot Pancreatic Cancer Early, Study Finds

But not early enough to make a big difference in survival rates, an expert saysPreliminary results show promise for

By Steven Reinberg

HealthDay Reporter

FRIDAY, March 29 (HealthDay News) -- A new blood test that detects deadly pancreatic cancer earlier than usual might slightly improve patients' odds for survival, a small Japanese study suggests.

"This new diagnostic test may be a safe and easy screening method that could improve the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer through earlier detection," said lead researcher Dr. Masaru Yoshida, an associate professor in the division of metabolomics research at Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine. "A drop of blood contains a lot of information."

Currently, the 5-year survival rate for pancreatic cancer is less than 5 percent, largely because the cancer usually has spread by the time it is detected.

The new approach relies on metabolomics technology, an emerging science that focuses on small molecules. The blood test measures byproducts of metabolism, called metabolites, found in the blood.

By looking for differences between the levels of metabolites in patients with and without pancreatic cancer, the researchers are able to identify those with cancer.

Finding pancreatic cancer earlier means more patients can have the tumor removed and live longer than most patients do now, Yoshida noted.

"Conventional tests using blood or imaging are not appropriate for pancreatic cancer screening and early detection, so new screening and diagnostic methods for pancreatic cancer are urgently required," Yoshida said.

Currently, in more than 80 percent of cases of pancreatic cancer, the cancer has metastasized, or spread, making it inoperable, he explained.

One expert doesn't think this test is a breakthrough.

"It's an improvement, but not a breakthrough," said Dr. James D'Olimpio, director of supportive oncology at North Shore-LIJ Cancer Institute in Lake Success, N.Y.

"The problem is it's not early enough," he said.

Even if the cancerous tumor can be removed, it's usually too late, he said. By the time the cancer is detected, even in the early stage suggested by their test, the cancer has most likely spread beyond the pancreas, D'Olimpio pointed out.

"The test is able to detect cancer when it is at stage 1, but it's a fatal disease once it gets past stage 0," D'Olimpio said. (Staging, which refers to the severity of a person's cancer, usually runs from 0 to 4.)

"The cure rates of these patients is still going to be less than 20 percent," he said.

For the study, published online March 29 in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, the researchers used a technology called gas chromatography mass spectrometry to analyze the blood from study participants.

The researchers randomly assigned 43 pancreatic cancer patients and 42 healthy participants to what they called a training set, where they made their initial findings. To validate their findings, they also tried the test on 42 patients with pancreatic cancer, 41 healthy people and 23 people with chronic pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas).

The researchers found 18 metabolites that were significantly different in patients with pancreatic cancer, compared with the healthy patients.

They refined their test using four metabolites to identify patients with pancreatic cancer.

The test had a sensitivity of 71.4 percent and a specificity of 78.1 percent when it was used with patients with pancreatic cancer and patients with chronic pancreatitis, the researchers reported. Sensitivity measures the accuracy of the test in identifying people with pancreatic cancer and specificity measures the accuracy of the test in weeding out those who didn't have the disease. Chronic pancreatitis is sometimes mistaken for cancer, so cutting down false positives is important.


View the original article here

Daily Sunscreen Helps Middle-Aged Skin Stay Young: Study

By Alan Mozes

HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, June 3 (HealthDay News) -- In the never-ending search for the fountain of youth, scientists have looked everywhere under the sun. But a group of Australian researchers now report that the answer lies out of the sun.

Regular daily use of sunscreen appears to significantly slow the process of skin aging among middle-aged men and women, they say.

The finding stems from 4.5 years spent tracking sunscreen use and its ultimate impact on skin quality among more than 900 men and women under the age of 55.

"This has been one of those beauty tips you often hear quoted, but for the first time we can back it with science," said study co-author Adele Green, lab head and senior research fellow with the Queensland Institute of Medical Research at Royal Brisbane Hospital. "Protecting yourself from skin cancer by using sunscreen regularly has the added bonus of keeping you looking younger."

"And the study has shown that up to middle age, it's not too late to make a difference," added Green, who also suggested that sunscreen use is likely to similarly benefit those over 55, though her team did not specifically assess a potential benefit among older users.

The findings appear in the June 4 issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Perhaps surprisingly, the authors point out that, to their knowledge, their current effort is the first rigorous scientific exploration of the potential protective effect of sunscreen on skin aging in people.

Green and her team looked at data collected in a study on skin cancer prevention conducted between 1992 and 1996 in Nambour, Australia.

The authors focused on 903 mostly fair-skinned men and women who were under the age of 55, under the assumption that skin aging in that age category would be brought on primarily by so-called "photoaging," as opposed to simply growing older.

Roughly half the participants worked primarily outdoors, while about four in 10 were regular smokers.

All the participants had been randomly assigned to two sunscreen groups. The first was specifically directed to use SPF 15 sunscreen on a daily basis, applying it to their head, neck, arms and hands every morning, and reapplying after bathing, heavy sweating or spending a few hours outside.

The second group was not told to avoid sunscreen, but rather to use it as they wished.

The study also assessed the potential impact of dietary antioxidants on skin quality. Each group of participants was further divided into half, in which one sub-group was given 30 milligrams of beta-carotene to take on a daily basis, while the other was given a sugar pill (placebo).

Using a process called "microtopography," the team then analyzed skin changes such as shifts in texture and roughness, by looking at the status of each participant's left hand.


View the original article here

Drug-Resistant 'Superbug' May Spread Among Patients, Study Finds

Title: Drug-Resistant 'Superbug' May Spread Among Patients, Study Finds
Category: Health News
Created: 3/29/2013 10:35:00 AM
Last Editorial Review: 3/29/2013 12:00:00 AM

View the original article here

Gaining a muscle weight for cylist

Hi everyone,

I've been cycling for all my life and it's been a big part in losing 50 pounds 3 years ago. I've been racing mountain bike when I was a little younger and I'm now considering racing again in the coming year. 

Since I lost all this weight I've been consistently noticing how my legs do not have the power they use to have. And the thing is I easily lose weight now because I'm pretty active and I seem to not be able to eat enough to compensate and every bike season for the past 3 years I've lost about 10 pounds compare to my winter weight.

I do understand I need to eat more but I am also well aware that i need to eat more protein and specific food to help rebuild muscle and keep my weight up.

So my question is how to keep biking (4-6 times a week, 10-12hr/week) and slowly rebuild my leg muscle and keep my weight up? I'm also considering doing some kettlebell workout 2-3 times a week to help building muscle. Although it's good as a cyclist to be on the light side, I definitely need to add power. 

What kind of food and how much calorie I should need daily to achieve this goal?

Are kettlebell workout be good for me ?

I currently weigh 140lb and is 5feet9inches tall. I eat about 2000-2500 cals a day currently.

Thanks for all your advice!


View the original article here

Saoirse Ronan at The Host screening


Saoirse Ronan wears a printed Proenza Schouler dress and black Christian Louboutins at The Host screening in NY - vote on celebrity fashion, style and red carpet looks in GLAMOUR.COM’s Dos and Don’ts

Continue reading...

View the original article here

Stella McCartney at the James McCartney concert in London


Stella McCartney wears a grey pinstripe coat, grey trousers and black ankle boots to the James McCartney concert in London - vote on celebrity fashion, style and red carpet looks in GLAMOUR.COM’s Dos and Don’ts

Continue reading...

View the original article here

Smokers Cost Employers Thousands More Than Nonsmokers

About $6000 in extra annual costs stem from more time off, smoking breaks, health care, study showsAbout $6000 in extra annual costs stem from more

By Mary Elizabeth Dallas

HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, June 4 (HealthDay News) -- Compared to nonsmoking employees, every staff member who lights up costs their employer nearly $6,000 more each year, according to a new report.

The researchers found that more time off, smoking breaks and added health care costs were to blame for this discrepancy. The findings could have implications for smoking policies in the workplace, they suggested.

"Employees who smoke impose significant excess costs on private employers," Micah Berman, of the College of Public Health & Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, and colleagues wrote. "The results of this study may help inform employer decisions about tobacco-related policies."

For the study, the investigators analyzed previous studies in order to estimate the costs associated with employing a smoker. In making their calculation, they also analyzed absenteeism, presenteeism (lower productivity while working due to smoking-related health problems), smoking breaks, health care costs and pension benefits for smokers.

The study, published in the June 3 online edition of Tobacco Control, revealed that low productivity due to more missed days at work costs employers, on average, $517 annually for each employee that smokes. Meanwhile, presenteeism costs $462 annually for each smoker, smoking breaks cost $3,077 a year per smoker and excess health care expenses cost $2,056 annually for every employee that smokes.

Because smokers are more likely to die at a younger age than nonsmokers, annual pension costs were an average of $296 less for each employee who smoked, the researchers noted. Overall, the total estimated cost to employers was $5,816 per year.

In the United States alone, 19 percent of adults smoke, putting themselves at greater risk for cancer, heart and lung disease. Some U.S. companies avoid hiring smokers or have started charging employees who smoke higher premiums for health insurance, the researchers pointed out in a journal news release.

"It is important to remember that the costs imposed by tobacco use are not simply financial costs. It is not possible to put a price on the lost lives and the human suffering caused by smoking," Berman's team wrote. "The desire to help one's employees lead healthier and longer lives should provide an additional impetus for employers to work towards eliminating tobacco from the workplace."


View the original article here

Joseph Gordon-Levitt out and about in New York


Browse through Glamour's extensive daily celebrity photo gallery online today. Check out what your favourite celebrity has been up to!

Continue reading...

View the original article here

want to maintain and boost metabolism

I recently lost some weight by restricting my calories too low. I want to start maintaining (happy at my current weight) but I also would like to boost my metabolism so I am maintaining on a more normal amount, and because I definitely have damaged my metabolism by restricting for 4 months!

I know gaining muscle and exercising is a good way, but I struggled with overexercising in the past, and due to injury, I am advised not to run. I like taking walks, and I stand a lot at work, but other than that, I try not to do too much FORMAL exercise because I get VERY obsessive-compulsive about it very quickly. I love this new freedom I have by not feeling forced to exercise, and I don't want to jeopardize it by starting a new program.

Basically my goal is to choose healthy foods (ex, a 400kcal meal for dinner instead of 400kcal of ice cream) and keep an eye on my calories, but should I risk raising my intake and possibly gain weight?

Right now I eat about 1400-1600/day and am more or less maintaining, although I feel like 1700-1800 is more reasonable for a girl my age, not to mention that I get quite hungry throughout the day and that shaky-hypoglycemic feeling (18 yrs, 5'5", 117 lbs). 


View the original article here

Cara Delevingne at the Melissa x Karl Lagerfeld launch


Cara Delevingne wears a silver metallic shirt, black jacket and maroon trousers at the Melissa x Karl Lagerfeld launch in NY - vote on celebrity fashion, style and red carpet looks in GLAMOUR.COM’s Dos and Don’ts

Continue reading...

View the original article here

Stooshe at the Tatty Devine I Heart Holi Launch Party in London


One of them might have been channelling Zippy from Rainbow but TLC worshipping girlband du jour, Stooshe, were all about the glamour at the Tatty Devine launch

Continue reading...

View the original article here

Eating Less=No Constipation?

So, a few years ago I did something really stupid and went a diet where I ate only like 900 or 1000 calories. The food I was consuming was all healthy, but I didn't realize this was dangerous at first.  I was able to stop doing this a few weeks later after research  indicated this could cause anorexia.

Still, one thing I realized while going on this diet was that constipation wasn't an issue any more.  But when I stopped eating 900 calories and went to 2000 calories after realizing what I was doing was dangerous(still on the diet)I had problems with constipation.  The food was mostly healthy; I'm sure some of you realize that reaching 2000 calories with oatmeal, apple, salad,  rice, etc. is impossible, so it wasn't as healthy.  Then again, it wasn't like I was going to McDonald's or drinking soda.

I'm still having problems with this now.  Any ideas on why this would happen?


View the original article here

AnnaSophia Robb on the street in NY


AnnaSophia Robb wears a brown shearling jacket, floral jeans and tan ankle boots on the street in NY - vote on celebrity fashion, style and red carpet looks in GLAMOUR.COM’s Dos and Don’ts

Continue reading...

View the original article here

New Drug May Slow Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Study found it prolonged remission after chemotherapy almost six months longer than a placeboSurveys reveal how well people are doing

By Dennis Thompson

HealthDay Reporter

SATURDAY, June 1 (HealthDay News) -- Women with advanced ovarian cancer stayed in remission almost six months longer when they were treated with the targeted drug pazopanib (Votrient), new German research says.

"Our findings show that we finally have a drug that can maintain control over ovarian cancer growth achieved through initial treatments," study author Dr. Andreas du Bois, a professor of gynecologic oncology at Kliniken Essen-Mitte in Essen, said in a statement. "If pazopanib is approved for ovarian cancer, many patients will experience longer disease-free and chemotherapy-free periods. During this time, the patient keeps control over the disease, instead of the disease having control over patient's life."

The results were to be presented Saturday at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting, in Chicago. Research presented at medical meetings is considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.

However, other cancer experts warned against placing too much hope in these early findings.

"I would say that it is intriguing, but I think it's important for the public to know this is not a home run," said Dr. Karen Lu, a professor of gynecologic oncology at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, in Houston. "This is an incremental step in the right direction. There did not seem to be a survival advantage. It does increase by 5.6 months, on average, the amount of time a woman does not need to be on chemotherapy, but in terms of prolonging survival or increasing the rate of cure, it doesn't reach that standard."

Advanced ovarian cancer is an aggressive disease with a cure rate of only 20 percent to 25 percent, according to background information in the study. It is often referred to as a "silent killer" because it usually is not detected until it has progressed into its later stages. Two of every three patients with advanced ovarian cancer experience a relapse following successful initial treatment with surgery and chemotherapy.

"Ovarian cancer is a difficult disease to treat," explained Dr. Len Lichtenfeld, deputy chief medical officer for the American Cancer Society. "We don't have effective screening, and women present with more advanced disease."

No targeted therapies are currently approved in the United States for maintenance treatment of ovarian cancer.

Pazopanib, which is taken in pill form, works by blocking the growth of tumors and their blood vessels. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has already approved its use for the treatment of kidney cancer and soft tissue sarcoma. The drug's maker, GlaxoSmithKline, funded this latest research.

In the study, 940 patients with stage III or IV ovarian cancer received either pazopanib or a placebo daily for 24 months. All patients already had gone through surgery and chemotherapy that successfully prevented the disease from worsening.


View the original article here

Cutting Out Mealtime Distractions May Help Manage Weight

Title: Cutting Out Mealtime Distractions May Help Manage Weight
Category: Health News
Created: 3/28/2013 2:35:00 PM
Last Editorial Review: 3/29/2013 12:00:00 AM

View the original article here