Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Christina Hendricks out in LA


Christina Hendricks wears rose-printed trousers and a white blouse out in LA - vote on celebrity fashion, style and red carpet looks in GLAMOUR.COM’s Dos and Don’ts

Continue reading...

View the original article here

Discovery reverses aging of mouse hearts—could it work in humans, too?

Anthony Komaroff, M.D.
Posted May 13, 2013, 12:19 pm Cardboard hearts

Every living thing is constantly aging. It seems universal and inevitable—a law of nature. Just look in the mirror, or check out your family and friends.

Yet in the past decade, a remarkable series of experiments from laboratories all over the world has begun to challenge that “law.” In both simple animals like worms and in more complicated animals like mice, scientists are discovering what causes aging—and how to slow it. The life spans of several simple animals have been extended greatly by simple biological manipulations. More important, during that extra time alive, the animals remain quite strong and fertile.

The latest example of such aging research was just reported in the prestigious scientific journal Cell by two of my Harvard Medical School colleagues. Cardiologist Richard T. Lee (co-editor in chief of the Harvard Heart Letter) and stem cell biologist Amy Wagers and their teams have found a substance that rejuvenates aging hearts in mice. (You can see a video of the researchers discussing their work below.) The discovery could someday lead to a treatment that prevents or reverses the most common kind of heart failure in humans: age-related diastolic dysfunction. There is currently no specific treatment that prevents or reverses this condition.

In diastolic dysfunction, the heart muscle becomes thicker and stiffer. As a result, when blood enters the heart, its muscular walls can’t stretch enough to accept all the blood flowing into it. That means the heart pumps less blood with each beat, making it difficult to circulate blood to every cell in the body. Blood backs up into the lungs, causing difficulty breathing. It also backs up into the rest of the body, causing fatigue and swelling, particularly in the legs and feet. That’s heart failure.

Mice have a similar condition. It develops as the animals get older, just like it does in humans. The team led by Lee and Wagers wondered if something was present in the blood of young mice that kept the heart young. To pursue that possibility, they joined the circulation of an old mouse to that of a young mouse. As a result, the two animals shared the same blood. After 4 weeks, the thickened and stiff heart muscle of the old mouse became dramatically thinner and more flexible.

In other words, it looked like Lee and Wagers’ hunch was right: some substance was present in the blood of young mice that rejuvenates the heart muscle of old mice. Most likely, that substance had been in the blood of the old mice when they were younger, but had decreased as the mice aged.

The team then identified a substance called growth differentiation factor 11 (GDF11) as a good candidate to be the “anti-aging” substance: it was at high levels in the blood of young mice but not old mice. To prove its role, Lee and Wagers gave old mice enough GDF11 so they had the same blood levels of it as young mice. Again, the thickened, stiff heart muscle of the old mice became rejuvenated. So at least in mice, a common kind of aging of the heart could be reversed by a particular anti-aging substance.

Will this discovery in mice offer any help to humans with heart failure? It will take a lot more research to know. It may not work in humans the way it works in mice. It may work in humans, but cause unacceptable side effects. Any beneficial effects might not last.

On the other hand, it also is possible that this substance has anti-aging effects in more organs than just the heart—and not only in mice, but maybe also in humans. So the discovery could have even greater potential than it now appears.

For me, what is important about this study is not whether it will help human health: we just can’t know if it will until much more research is performed.

What I find important is that the work by Lee and Wagers, like a number of studies before it, reveals a remarkable new truth: there are substances naturally present in all living things that cause aging and that retard it. In other words, aging is not a mystical process. Aging is chemistry. By understanding that chemistry, we may someday be able to slow aging.

Share

View the original article here

DNA Test Shows Promise in Guiding Advanced Breast Cancer Care

Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.

View the original article here

How can I get my toddler to stop biting?

Posted May 15, 2013, 2:00 am bigstock-beautiful-baby-biting-baby-st-30015539

Today at the playground my toddler bit another child. How can I make sure she doesn’t do this again?

Lots of toddlers between 1 and 3 years go through biting and/or hitting stages. Children at these ages cannot yet express in words their feelings, so they may bite or hit parents, children or caregivers to get attention or to express frustration. These young children also may bite just to see what kind of reaction it provokes.

Toddlers will try any behavior to achieve a goal — until they learn that the behavior is unacceptable. If we didn’t know it was unacceptable, we adults would probably revert to behaving like toddlers. (In fact, no surprise, we sometimes do.) And kids who know a behavior is unacceptable still will do it when the conditions are right.

A friend’s 5-year-old daughter was alone in the living room bouncing a ball. The ball knocked over a vase. When her mother heard the crash, she came into the room, saw what had happened and said to her daughter: “You know you’re not supposed to bounce a ball inside the house! Why did you do that?” Her daughter replied, “‘Cause you weren’t looking, Mom.”

Back to the biting: The reasons for this aggressive behavior may be understandable, but the behavior itself is never acceptable. Biting and hitting hurt, and children need to learn more appropriate ways to express themselves.

My pediatrician colleagues here at Harvard Medical School tell me that when your child bites or hits, it is very important to make a swift, direct response. Tell your daughter what she should not do, why she should not do it, and what the consequences will be if she does it again. State firmly and immediately: “No! Do not bite! Biting hurts! If you do it again, no TV for you tonight!” Keep your words simple and short. Children this age don’t have the attention span or developmental ability to understand long explanations.

After responding to your child’s misbehavior, try to figure out why she acted this way. If she is biting or hitting to get attention, discourage this behavior by making extra efforts to praise her when she behaves appropriately. If your child has kicked or bitten another child, pay special attention to the victim. Your child will learn that by misbehaving, her attempts to get your attention have backfired.

If she is biting to relieve teething pain, offer her something soft to chew on. If she is frustrated or angry, remove her from the situation. If she has started to talk, suggest words that she can use to express her feelings. If she is overstimulated, over-tired or hungry, address the specific need and try to anticipate it in the future.

If aggressive behaviors are properly addressed as soon as they occur, most children learn quickly that this kind of behavior is unacceptable and stop. If your child is older than 3 years and is still hitting and/or biting, your pediatrician may recommend that she see a child psychiatrist.

window.fbAsyncInit = function() { FB.init({appId: "199616670120169", status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true});}; (function() { var e = document.createElement("script"); e.async = true; e.src = document.location.protocol + "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js"; document.getElementById("fb-root").appendChild(e);}());Share

View the original article here

Damian Lewis in The Vicar Of Dibley


Damian Lewis stars in the Vicar of Dibley for Comic Relief - Get the latest in celebrity style and fashion from Glamour.com. Visit Glamour.com to get all the latest celebrity styles, fashion and gossip.

Continue reading...

View the original article here

Are calcium supplements unhealthy for men?

Posted May 16, 2013, 2:00 am

I’m a man in my 60s. I’ve been taking a calcium supplement to protect my bones, but I recently read that men shouldn’t take calcium supplements. Why not?

I wish I could give you a clear answer. Several recent studies have raised a question about whether regular use of calcium supplements might be bad for the heart. The bottom line: It’s too early to know if this risk is real.

There’s no doubt that we need calcium. It helps muscles to contract, blood to clot and nerves to communicate. And it plays an important role in building strong teeth and bones. As a result, many people take calcium supplements for bone health.

One new study followed the health of nearly 400,000 men and women. The study was published in the medical journal JAMA Internal Medicine. At the study’s start, the participants reported how much supplemental calcium they took. From diet surveys, the researchers estimated how much calcium the study participants were getting from food.

During 12 years of follow-up, men who took more than 1,000 milligrams (mg) of supplemental calcium per day were 20 percent more likely to succumb to heart disease than those who didn’t take calcium supplements. But there was no connection between calcium supplements and heart disease in women, and there was no connection with calcium from food.

Another recent study that followed more than 61,000 women in Sweden was published in the medical journal BMJ. Among women who took more than 1,400 milligrams per day of calcium supplements, the risk of premature death was more than doubled — particularly death from heart disease.

Both of these studies, and others that have pointed in a similar direction, involve large numbers of people and were carefully conducted. Yet they are observational studies, and you can’t make judgments about cause and effect from such studies. They clearly showed that men and women who took relatively high doses of calcium supplements had higher risks. But that doesn’t prove that the calcium supplements were the cause of higher rates of heart problems and death.

Surely, these studies don’t mean that you should forsake all calcium. Everyone needs calcium to keep bones strong, taken in conjunction with the bone-building vitamin, vitamin D. Losing calcium weakens bones and leaves them more prone to breaking. (I’ve put a table listing the daily recommended intakes of calcium and vitamin D below.)

With the safety of calcium supplements in question, try to get as much calcium as possible from food. Good calcium sources include:

Low-fat milk and cheese;Calcium-fortified orange juice or soy milk;Breakfast cereals (which are also fortified);Leafy greens, particularly, kale, turnip greens and Swiss chard. (Go easy on spinach. It is high in iron, which tends to block calcium absorption.)Sardines and other canned fish with bones included.

I’m sure there will be more research studies on this important question. I’ll keep you posted.

window.fbAsyncInit = function() { FB.init({appId: "199616670120169", status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true});}; (function() { var e = document.createElement("script"); e.async = true; e.src = document.location.protocol + "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js"; document.getElementById("fb-root").appendChild(e);}());Share

View the original article here

Jared Leto at South By SouthWest Festival


Browse through Glamour's extensive daily celebrity photo gallery online today. Check out what your favourite celebrity has been up to!

Continue reading...

View the original article here

Jessie J at the BBC Radio One studios


Jessie J wears a monochrome printed jumpsuit, blue suede heels and a white coat to the BBC Radio One studios - vote on celebrity fashion, style and red carpet looks in GLAMOUR.COM’s Dos and Don’ts

Continue reading...

View the original article here

Threat to U.S. from new “bird flu” virus: possible but unknown

Anthony Komaroff, M.D.
Posted May 17, 2013, 2:23 pm H7N9 virus

Beginning in March, 2013, reports started to come out of Eastern China that a new “bird flu” virus was loose and causing infections in humans. The new virus is called H7N9. Should we in the U.S. be worried?

Neither I nor anyone I know can give a confident answer to that question. What makes flu viruses so unpredictable is that they are constantly changing or mutating their genes. They also are constantly swapping their genes with the genes of other flu viruses. When they change or swap their genes, they change their character.

When I hear about a new flu virus, I want to know two things about it: how easily is it spread from one person to another, and how sick does it make the people it infects?

A report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and another from a team from China in this week’s New England Journal of Medicine, indicate that so far the new H7N9 virus has not clearly spread from one person to another, and has not spread outside of Eastern China. But things can change quickly with flu viruses.

H7N9 has made people very sick, however. Indeed, all three of the people infected with virus described in the New England Journal of Medicine died.

As of the end of April, the CDC said that China had reported 126 human cases of the new flu. The people tend to be older (average age in their 60s) and many have had chronic illnesses. Fewer children and young adults have been infected, so far.

The world is full of different flu viruses. Most of them infect just animals, often just one type of animal. Sometimes a flu virus “jumps” from one animal to another. Sometimes, it is even able to jump from animals to humans. That’s what has happened with H7N9. It has jumped from chickens and ducks to humans.

So far, none of the health care workers caring for people stricken with the new virus have contracted the virus. No travelers from China to the U.S. have been found carrying the virus.

In other words, as I write this article, there does not appear to be a clear threat to people outside of Eastern China. But every public health agency around the world is keeping a close eye on China. That’s because a virus that cannot spread easily from one person to another can change or swap genes—and suddenly be capable of spreading easily. We know of no reason why this could not happen with H7N9. And we know that it can produce severe, even fatal, illness.

How bad can a flu virus be? The worst flu outbreak for which we have good records occurred in 1918. A new virus emerged that spread easily between people and made people very sick.

How easily, and how sick? In the course of a few months, 30% of the people in the world caught the virus, and at least 20 million people died. That’s more than were killed in World War I.

Here in Boston, at the height of the pandemic, 200 dead people every day were carried through the streets in horse-drawn wagons, and often buried in mass graves. As in many other cities around the world, overnight there were hundreds and thousands of orphans. The grandmother of one of my colleagues on the faculty here was one of those orphans. I am not being melodramatic: the worse influenza pandemics can be truly awful.

The CDC and scientists at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) are working overtime to protect our health. But these two critically important federal agencies have just had their budgets slashed by the “sequester.”

Regardless of what you think about federal spending in general, if you share my view that we should not be cutting funding for health research and public health, you could do what I have done. Write your representatives in Congress to restore cuts in the CDC and NIH budgets.

Share

View the original article here

Zoe Saldana at the Hollywood Reporter Luncheon


Zoe Saldana at the Hollywood Reporter Luncheon - vote on celebrity fashion, style and red carpet looks in GLAMOUR.COM’s Dos and Don’ts

Continue reading...

View the original article here

Angelina Jolie’s prophylactic mastectomy a difficult decision

Stephanie Watson
Posted May 15, 2013, 11:50 am Angelina Jolie

Angelina Jolie revealed yesterday in a New York Times op-ed article that she underwent a double mastectomy so she wouldn’t get breast cancer. Choosing that operation must have been an extraordinarily difficult decision. Going public with it must have been equally difficult. Telling her story may help other women learn more about the genes that underlie some—but not all—breast cancers and the tests available for them. For some women, the benefits of such a serious preventive step outweigh the risks, for personal and medical reasons. But this may not be true for every woman.

Jolie underwent what’s called a prophylactic double mastectomy. That means she had both of her breasts removed even though she hadn’t been diagnosed with breast cancer. She said she did this because she carries a gene, called BRCA1, that significantly increases the odds of developing breast or ovarian cancer.

A related gene, BRCA2, also greatly boosts the chances of developing breast cancer. (Men with these mutations also have an increased risk of breast cancer.) You can learn more about BRCA1 and BRAC2 at the National Cancer Institute’s website.

In the general population, about 12 out of 100 women (12%) will develop breast cancer at some point during their lives. Among women who have inherited a harmful mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2, 60 out of 100 (60%) will develop breast cancer. Women who have at least two close relatives—a mother, sister, or daughter—who have had breast or ovarian cancer are also at much higher risk. (Jolie’s mother died of ovarian cancer at age 56.) These women are good candidates for prophylactic mastectomy.

Some women, like Jolie, undergo prophylactic mastectomy before they have ever been diagnosed with breast cancer. Others have both breasts removed when a tumor is found in one breast.

The use of prophylactic mastectomy doubled between 1998 and 2005, according to a report in the journal Current Oncology Reports, and is likely still rising. One reason is more widespread use of genetic tests for BRCA1 and BRCA2.

It’s also possible that high-visibility celebrities who undergo prophylactic mastectomy because they are at high risk for developing breast cancer, like Jolie and Sharon Osbourne, and those like Christina Applegate, who had a double mastectomy after a tumor was found in one breast, are making women more aware of this option.

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with breast cancer, it’s important to take some time to weigh your options. A University of Michigan study showed that nearly three-quarters of women who opted to have prophylactic mastectomy were actually at very low risk of developing cancer in the healthy breast. According to the researchers, those women didn’t have a good medical reason for doing it and were “not expected to benefit in terms of disease-free survival.”

That’s not to say their decisions were wrong. They made the best personal choices for their physical and mental health. About 90% of the women who had a preventive mastectomy said they were “very worried” about facing cancer again, and the prophylactic mastectomy eased this fear. A new study from the University of Pittsburgh indicates that most women who undergo prophylactic mastectomy were glad they did it and would recommend to other women in their situation.

But the University of Michigan research suggests that women diagnosed with breast cancer be given more and better information about their chances of developing cancer in the other breast and about the risks and benefits of prophylactic mastectomy. All surgery carries the risk for complications and the recovery for mastectomy—and reconstructive surgery should a woman opt for that—take a toll, albeit usually a temporary one.

Taking time to make the decision, and talking it over with a trusted and knowledgeable expert, is an important part of the decision-making process. Having as much information as possible before choosing prophylactic mastectomy is as empowering as making the decision itself.

Share

View the original article here

Kate Moss and Jamie Hince out and about in London


Kate Moss and Jamie Hince were spotted heading to dinner last night - Get the latest in celebrity style and fashion from Glamour.com. Visit Glamour.com to get all the latest celebrity styles, fashion and gossip.

Continue reading...

View the original article here

What is vasculitis and how is it treated?

Posted May 18, 2013, 2:00 am bigstock-doctor-checking-blood-pressure-17566802

My father recently saw his doctor, complaining of fever, fatigue, joint pain and rashes. His doctor suspects vasculitis. What is vasculitis? How is it diagnosed and treated?

Vasculitis is an inflammation of the blood vessels. This inflammation can be severe enough to reduce blood flow to tissues and organs. We don’t know for sure what causes it, but scientists believe it is an autoimmune disease. For some reason, the immune system mistakenly attacks the blood vessels, causing them to become inflamed. Under the microscope, you can see immune system cells next to the walls of blood vessels, and the walls have been damaged (presumably by the attack).

There are many different types of vasculitis, affecting blood vessels of different sizes and in different locations. The various forms also differ by the age at which they typically begin and the symptoms they cause. Following are the types of vasculitis your father may be dealing with:

Giant cell arteritis (temporal arteritis) affects medium to large arteries, including those around the scalp, face, eyes. This type also affects the aorta as it branches from the heart, up into the neck and head.Takayasu arteritis affects the body’s biggest artery, the aorta, and its main branches.Polyarteritis nodosa affects small- to medium-sized blood vessels, especially in the skin, intestines, kidneys and nerves.Kawasaki disease is particularly likely to involve the arteries of the heart. It occurs mainly in children and can cause fatal heart attacks in young children.Hypersensitivity vasculitis affects the smallest blood vessels, especially those in the skin. It is triggered by an allergy, particularly to a drug.Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s) affects small- and medium-sized blood vessels in the kidneys and in the upper and lower respiratory tract.Vasculitis due to rheumatologic diseases. The two most common of these diseases to produce vasculitis are systemic lupus erythematosus (lupus) and rheumatoid arthritis.Vasculitis due to infection. Certain viruses cause vasculitis. Two examples are hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus.

The most accurate way to diagnose vasculitis is with a tissue biopsy. The doctor removes a small tissue sample from an organ (such as skin, muscle, nerve or kidney) to be examined in a laboratory.

Before a biopsy, however, the doctor is likely to do some less invasive tests. These may include blood tests to check for inflammation, immune system activity, and liver and kidney function. Urine analysis may also be done to evaluate possible kidney problems.

The main treatment for most types of vasculitis is prednisone. This corticosteroid works by reducing inflammation. Additional treatments depend on the form of vasculitis. For example, a doctor may treat giant cell arteritis with an immune-suppressing medication.

The intensity and duration of the treatment depends on the type and cause of the vasculitis. The good news is that most cases of vasculitis can be treated successfully.

window.fbAsyncInit = function() { FB.init({appId: "199616670120169", status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true});}; (function() { var e = document.createElement("script"); e.async = true; e.src = document.location.protocol + "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js"; document.getElementById("fb-root").appendChild(e);}());Share

View the original article here

Adele to buy LA home?


Adele is reportedly planning to buy a home in Los Angeles.

Continue reading...

View the original article here