Showing posts with label Needed. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Needed. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

A bit of advice needed

Good day

I'm a 22 year old guy, weigh about 74 or so kg, am 162cm tall. I have developed a binging habit from restricting my diet too much. I do weight training 5 days a week and cardio 6 days a week. Using this I got that I should maintain my weight at 2500 calories a day. What I need advice on is if I eat about 2000 calories a day with the exercise I currently do, will I be able to keep up my weight loss, even after having restricted my diet for so long? I need to stop the binging now, but I don't want to derail weight loss. I just need to do it in a bit more of a healthier way.

Thanks for any help!


View the original article here

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Really really bad bloating issues - advice needed!

I am a 15 year old girl suffering from anorexia, height 166 cm  and weight 39 kg. Yesterday I severely restricted because I thought I had binged the day before, and today I have eaten quite a bit more than usual. I have really really bad bloating and indigestion, I am badly constipated and my chest hurts. Is this due to the fact that I restricted and then started eating normally again??


View the original article here

Friday, September 6, 2013

Half of People With Hepatitis C Don't Complete Needed Tests: CDC

News Picture: Half of People With Hepatitis C Don't Complete Needed Tests: CDC

TUESDAY, May 7 (HealthDay News) -- Only about half of Americans who are infected with hepatitis C undergo follow-up testing to determine if they are still infected, federal officials reported Tuesday.

"Many people who test positive on an initial hepatitis C test are not receiving the necessary follow-up test to know if their body has cleared the virus or if they are still infected," Dr. Tom Frieden, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said in an agency news release.

"Complete testing is critical to ensure that those who are infected receive the care and treatment for hepatitis C that they need in order to prevent liver cancer and other serious and potentially deadly health consequences," Frieden said.

A blood test, called an antibody test, is used to check if a person has ever been infected with hepatitis C. For people who have had a positive result, a follow-up test -- called an RNA test -- can determine if they are still infected so they can receive necessary care and treatment.

Some people's bodies can clear hepatitis C infection on their own, but about 80 percent of people with hepatitis C remain infected and can develop major health problems.

In this study, researchers analyzed data from eight regions across the United States. Only 51 percent of the hepatitis C patients reported in these regions had a follow-up test, according to the Vital Signs report from the CDC.

"Hepatitis C has few noticeable symptoms, and left undiagnosed it threatens the health of far too many Americans -- especially baby boomers," Dr. John Ward, director of the CDC's Division of Viral Hepatitis, said in the news release. "Identifying those who are currently infected is important because new effective treatments can cure the infection better than ever before, as well as eliminate the risk of transmission to others."

About 3 million Americans are infected with hepatitis C, and as many as 75 percent do not know they are infected. The study found that 67 percent of all reported cases of current hepatitis C infection were among baby boomers, which includes people born from 1945 through 1965.

All people born in the United States during those years should be tested for hepatitis C, the CDC advised. The agency also recommended testing for other people at increased risk, including injection-drug users and people who received blood transfusions or organ transplants before widespread screening of the blood supply began in 1992.

May is Hepatitis Awareness Month, and May 19 is National Hepatitis Testing Day.

-- Robert Preidt MedicalNews
Copyright © 2013 HealthDay. All rights reserved. SOURCE: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, news release, May 7, 2013



View the original article here

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

question about muscle building and calories needed

i am at a healthy weight that I want to maintain but I am starting a heavy lifting regime so I can convert the fat into muscle. In order to do this successfully, do I need to be eating maintenance calories or a weight loss amount? Logically I would think it would be maintenance but I am not totally sure how this works.


View the original article here

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Question regarding my activity level and calories needed

Hey everyone!  

When I go to college, I had free access to the pretty nice campus gym, so I would workout 4 days a week.  Usually over the summer I get a gym membership.  I have a busy job, however.  I work at Chipotle (its a mexican fast food type restaurant) and it is VERY busy.  I work 40 hours a week but my shift is usually 4 to midnight closing.

I was going to purchase my gym membership, but I was pretty hesitant to do it because I don't have much spare time outside of work, it costs a decent amount, and I actually am so exhausted after work I wonder how many calories I am actually burning.

I was just wondering if you think my job is exercise enough, or if I should increase it.  I don't know if I should even count it as exercise, but it sure as hell feels like I'm getting a workout.  My legs ache the next day.  I work 8 hour shifts and i get one half hour break.  The rest of the time I am serving customers in mass amounts quickly as possible, frantically making burritos.  And I usually close, so that involves scrubbing the tortilla and quesadilla press clean and cleaning out the food wells, doing dishes, etc.  

I am a 5 foot 9, 20 year old female weighing in at 135 pounds.  I was just wondering what others input is.  Am I fooling myself by telling myself I'm burning a significant amount of calories and that work is a workout, or am I not giving myself enough credit?  How many calories do you think I should eat, what do you think my activity level is?  Help!

Thank you for your time!


View the original article here

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Parents Will Push for Medication, Even If Doc Says Not Needed

Title: Parents Will Push for Medication, Even If Doc Says Not Needed
Category: Health News
Created: 4/1/2013 10:35:00 AM
Last Editorial Review: 4/1/2013 12:00:00 AM

View the original article here

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Parents Will Push for Medication, Even If Doc Says Not Needed

Survey dealt with hypothetical diagnosis of digestive disorder in young childSurvey dealt with hypothetical diagnosis of

By Alan Mozes

HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, April 1 (HealthDay News) -- When doctors use quick-and-easy disease labels to sum up symptoms of concern in an otherwise healthy infant, parents are more apt to want to treat their child with some type of medication, even if they're told that drugs won't help, new research says.

The finding was gleaned from the results of a survey administered in a general pediatric clinic setting. The poll had asked parents how they would react to being told that their child's excessive crying and spitting amounted to a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), rather than being given no specific disease label at all.

The study highlights the powerful impact that a physician's choice of words can have on parental decision-making, while emphasizing the importance of good doctor-patient/parent communication.

"The disease label seems to send the message that there is an illness that requires medical treatment," explained study lead author Laura Scherer, an assistant professor in the department of psychological sciences at the University of Missouri. "But, depending on the situation, medical treatments may be necessary, or not. In the case of GERD, an otherwise healthy infant probably will not benefit from medication. So in this case [that] label can be misleading."

Scherer and her colleagues published their findings in the May issue of Pediatrics.

Though the survey results speak to the potential impact of disease-labeling as a whole, the authors noted that the issue is of specific interest with respect to GERD. A growing concern is that this particular condition is both overdiagnosed and overtreated among basically healthy children.

Between 2011 and 2012, the investigators surveyed 175 parents (whose average age was about 35) either while in a pediatric clinic waiting room or an examination room. Most participants were mothers and described as highly educated. The average age of their sons and daughters was 4.5 years. About one-fifth of these children had been previously diagnosed with GERD.

Parents were randomly given one of four hypothetical scenarios: Their infant had GERD and existing drugs were ineffective; their infant had GERD without any comment on medications; no disease label was offered in the context of drugs being ineffective; or no disease label or drug information was offered.

The result: Those parents who were given a GERD diagnosis ended up being interested in treating their infant with drugs despite being specifically cautioned that drugs wouldn't work.

By contrast, parents who were not offered a single disease label to describe their infant's crying and spitting symptoms only expressed an interest in drug treatment if the physician did not raise the issue of the drug's ineffectiveness. This left parents to assume that the relevant drugs worked.

When medicinal ineffectiveness was discussed, these parents expressed no eagerness to launch a drug treatment.


View the original article here

Saturday, April 20, 2013

Multiple Tests Needed to Spot Infections in Newborns: Study

Title: Multiple Tests Needed to Spot Infections in Newborns: Study
Category: Health News
Created: 2/20/2013 6:36:00 PM
Last Editorial Review: 2/21/2013 12:00:00 AM

View the original article here

Sunday, January 13, 2013

Pap Tests Often Given When Not Needed

doctor talking with female patient

Dec. 3, 2012 -- Against clinical guidelines, many women are still getting Pap smears (a test that’s meant to find cancer of the cervix) even after they've had a total hysterectomy, which removes the uterus and cervix, according to a new government report.

The cervix is the “neck-like” lower part of the uterus. A Pap test uses cells scraped from the cervix to check for early changes that may indicate cervical cancer or precancer. The new report, from the CDC, looked at trends in Pap testing in U.S. women from 2000 to 2010.

In telephone surveys of thousands of women, about 60% of those over age 30 who said they’d had a hysterectomy also reported having a recent Pap smear in 2010.

Even though that number was down about 15 percentage points since 2000, researchers said it was still too high.

“Some of these women would need continued screening, for various reasons, but that’s a small percentage,” says researcher Meg Watson, MPH, an epidemiologist with the CDC’s Division of Cancer Prevention and Control. “We wouldn’t think it would be 60%.”

A hysterectomy is an operation that removes all or part of the uterus. The most common kind of hysterectomy is a total hysterectomy, or an operation that removes both uterus and cervix.

Even after the cervix has been removed, doctors can scrape cells from an area called the vaginal cuff. And in the past, Watson says, many doctors continued to perform the test even after a total hysterectomy to check for signs of vaginal cancers.

“But vaginal cancer rates are quite low,” Watson says, and subsequent studies have shown that using Pap smears to find vaginal cancers isn’t an effective strategy.

Experts who were not involved in the research agree.

“It doesn’t really make a lot of sense,” says Virginia Moyer, MD, MPH, a pediatrician and chair of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, a panel of expert advisors that makes recommendations about tests and treatments that are meant to prevent disease.

Last year, the panel said most healthy women only need Pap smears every three years, and it advised women who’d had total hysterectomies for reasons other than cancer to skip the test altogether.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Cancer Society also recommended against routine Pap smears after a total hysterectomy.

“The only thing I can sort of speculate is that people get in the habit of doing them and just keep doing them without really thinking about it, which is regrettable,” Moyer says.

The Pap test is one of the great success stories in medicine. Before it was introduced, in the 1950s, cervical cancer was a leading cause of cancer death in women. The test is credited with helping cut the rates of cervical cancer deaths by 60% between 1955 and 1992.

But like many cancer screening tests, Pap tests can be harmful as well as helpful.  

Watson says studies have shown that for every 100 abnormal Pap tests, only one woman will actually turn out to have cervical cancer. But all 100 women would need additional testing and sometimes invasive procedures to rule out cancer. That can cause significant anxiety and stress.

In cases where a woman has her cervix or uterus removed after cervical cancer, she would need to continue to get a regular Pap smear to check for cancer recurrence, Watson says.

But about 90% of hysterectomies are performed for non-cancerous conditions, like uterine fibroids.

“Obviously the large majority of that group would be people who had an unnecessary Pap smear,” Moyer says.


View the original article here