Showing posts with label Financial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Financial. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Medicaid Expansion Enhances Financial and Mental Well-Being, Study Says

Yet no clear evidence the program improves diabetes, high-blood pressure, other ills, at least in early years of enrollmentDiagnosis-related claims -- not surgical or

By Karen Pallarito

HealthDay Reporter

WEDNESDAY, May 1 (HealthDay News) -- As states prepare to expand Medicaid in 2014, a new study provides insight into how that health insurance coverage might affect low-income adults and what it means for access to care and the cost of care.

The study found that having Medicaid -- the U.S. public health insurance program for lower-income Americans -- reduced financial strain related to out-of-pocket health care costs and improved mental health during the first two years of enrollment.

Medicaid also increased prescription drug use and office visits, according to the study, which is based on data from Oregon's 2008 Medicaid expansion.

People with Medicaid spent $1,172 a year more -- about 35 percent more -- on medical care than a comparable group of adults not enrolled in the program.

Yet there's no clear evidence that having Medicaid improved control of diabetes, high-blood pressure and high cholesterol, at least in the early years of enrollment.

"One thing it doesn't tell us is what happens three, four, five and six years later, and that's important because so many of the benefits of health care accumulate over time," said Dr. David Meltzer, associate professor of medicine, economics and public policy studies at the University of Chicago, who was not involved in the study.

Expanding Medicaid to millions of uninsured adults is one of the goals of the 2010 health reform law known as the Affordable Care Act.

Oregon's experience offers a rare opportunity to examine the effects of Medicaid coverage by comparing people who made it into a health care lottery program with those who did not. Unable to cover everyone who wanted to enroll in Medicaid, Oregon held lottery drawings, pulling names from a waiting list of nearly 90,000 uninsured people to fill 10,000 openings.

For the study, published online May 2 in the New England Journal of Medicine, researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health and Massachusetts Institute of Technology conducted more than 12,000 in-person interviews and health exams of lottery participants in the Portland, Ore., area about two years after the lottery.

"It's not just another study on Medicaid; it's the first randomized, controlled study of Medicaid," said lead author Katherine Baicker, professor of health economics in the department of health policy and management at the Harvard School of Public Health.

When comparing outcomes of the people selected to apply for Medicaid with those who were not selected, the researchers found that:

Use of health services increased among Medicaid enrollees. "People go to the doctor more, they use more prescription drugs, they go to the hospital more, they get more preventive care," Baicker said.Medicaid enrollment improved access to care, sharply increasing some preventive health screenings, including mammography for women and PSA testing for men.Medicaid nearly eliminated "catastrophic" expenditures -- out-of-pocket medical expenses exceeding 30 percent of income. "It's important to remember that Medicaid is not just about access to health care," Baicker added. "Like any insurance product, it's also supposed to protect you from financial ruin if you have a high medical expense."The rate of depression dropped by 30 percent among people with Medicaid versus people without insurance who screened positive for depression. The authors don't offer an explanation for this, but the study noted that having Medicaid led to an increase in the probability of receiving a diagnosis of depression. "The suggestion is that there were people walking around with undiagnosed depression who were then treated," Baicker said.Medicaid's impact on physical health -- specifically high blood pressure, high cholesterol and high blood-sugar levels (indicating diabetes) -- was less clear-cut. The research team chose those health outcomes because they are widespread and serious, yet treatable.

View the original article here

Saturday, May 18, 2013

The Financial Impact of Sports Injuries

Playing sports is good for you in many ways. It's a great way to be active, connect with friends, ease stress, and enjoy your free time.

Still, injuries can happen.

If you've had a sports injury, here are five ways to minimize the impact on your wallet.

Have you had a doctor check out your injury? That's the first step to let you find out:

How serious the injury isWhat the recovery will be likeAny limitations you'll have while you heal

The more you know, the easier it will be to make financial plans. And talking with your doctor is important if you intend to apply for disability assistance.

If your doctor prescribes physical therapy for your injury, go. The rehab will help you recover.

Some health insurance plans limit payments for rehabilitation. So check with your carrier to see what your policy offers.

If you'll be sidelined for a short time, you may be able to negotiate a leave of absence from work. That way you'll collect all or part of your paycheck.

Depending on what kind of work you do, you may be able to take on other responsibilities while you recover from your injury. Or you may be able to work from home. The human resources manager at your job can let you know about your options.

If you may be out of work for several months or longer, check on options for disability assistance.

Group or private disability insurance. Some employers offer disability insurance plans for all employees. Ask your human resources manager if you have it. Keep in mind that you can't get disability insurance for an injury that has already happened.

You may also be able to get benefits from a private disability insurance policy.

"Private disability insurance plans typically pay all or most of your pre-disability income for the first year or two if you cannot perform the duties of the job you held before becoming disabled," says Nancy G. Shor, an expert in disability coverage. Shor is executive director of the National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives.  "After two years, many policies continue paying only if you are unable to do any kind of work."

State disability assistance. Some states offer their own disability insurance plans. Requirements vary widely. Contact your state's department of employment for information.

Social Security disability. Social Security offers disability benefits. You may qualify if you are unable to do the work you were doing before your injury. You may also qualify if you can't do any other kind of work because of physical or mental impairment.    

Medicare. If you are disabled and unable to work for more than two years, you qualify for Medicare. That's the case even if you are below retirement age.

Medicare can be particularly helpful if your disability involves ongoing medical costs.

Workers' compensation. Most sports injuries aren't covered by workers' compensation, which is typically limited to injuries on the job. There are exceptions, however. You may be covered if you're injured during an activity sponsored by your employer. And you might also be covered if the injury happened during an activity that your employer specifically encouraged you to do.


View the original article here

Friday, May 3, 2013

Fiscal Standoff Could Cause Financial Pain for Health Care

Simple swab-based cleansing cut rates of some

By Barbara Bronson Gray

HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, Feb. 28 (HealthDay News) -- "Sequestration" is Washington-speak for the approximately $85 billion in annual federal spending cuts mandated by the Budget Control Act of 2011. Those cuts were originally set to take effect on Jan. 1, but were delayed in the deal to avert the so-called "fiscal cliff" of tax increases and budget reductions.

But those cuts are set to kick in Friday, with spending reductions coming to a wide range of areas and programs, including health care, defense, education, air travel and agriculture.

Portions of health care and related programs would be somewhat unscathed -- for instance Medicaid, the government-run insurance program for poorer Americans, would be left untouched.

But experts point to three key areas that health-care consumers should be concerned about, not just in the days ahead but as Congressional Republicans and President Barack Obama continue to wrangle over the budget for the next fiscal year starting in October:

Hospitals: Decreases in Medicare reimbursement for hospitals and skilled nursing facilities are set to total nearly $4.5 billion, or about $1.3 million for the average facility. Such cuts are expected to result in layoffs, especially of nurses, who represent the largest percentage of employees in hospitals.Physicians: Medicare payments to doctors could drop by as much as 3 percent to 4 percent, according to some estimates, totaling about $4.1 billion. The reduction in revenue could be the last straw for frustrated physicians who may stop accepting Medicare patients -- who tend to be 65 or older -- or decide to retire a little sooner than they had planned.Research: Federal agencies such as the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are each facing funding cuts of about 5 percent, or about $2.5 billion in all. The reductions could slow FDA reviews of proposed new drugs and medical devices, for example, and curtail some services at the CDC -- such as infection control and immunization. The real impact on research projects, which are typically long-term efforts, is harder to estimate.

While the mandated budget cuts are threatening in the short run, experts said the real challenge lies down the road. For instance, the combination of an increasingly tight federal budget and the growing number of retiring baby boomers could bring the financial challenges facing Medicare -- the government-run insurance program for older Americans -- to a whole new level.

"The real issue that the public should be concerned about is, what do the president and Congress plan to do next [fiscal] year, Oct. 1? They're twiddling their thumbs right now and what we need is a functioning government," said Joseph Antos, a health policy expert with the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C.


View the original article here